Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses
От | Fabrízio de Royes Mello |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFcNs+paF3O4tJ470kXf-Csog2Fr-eW3nz_yWxFcO9hDbMbZ0Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:>> You plan to commit it?> Michael, you're now modifying the patch?
>
> Yes unless many people object the commit.
>
OK, I have been able to put my head into that earlier than I thought
as it would be better to get that done before the beta, finishing with
the attached. When hacking that, I noticed that some tests were
missing for some of the operators. I am including them in this patch
as well, with more tests for unique index creation, ordering, and
hash/btree index creation. The test suite looks cleaner with all that.
Last night I sent a patch [1] to add more tests and change the operator name. Maybe we can merge the test cases... ;-)
Regards,
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: