Re: Re: Proposal: Store "timestamptz" of database creation on "pg_database"
От | Fabrízio de Royes Mello |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Proposal: Store "timestamptz" of database creation on "pg_database" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFcNs+o3t-1fvBvhKTTUY1Twp==i5YTH2KqLexvWYZKY+8oaTQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: Proposal: Store "timestamptz" of database creation on "pg_database" (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: Proposal: Store "timestamptz" of database creation
on "pg_database"
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
<div dir="ltr"><br />* Stephen Frost <<a href="mailto:sfrost@snowman.net">sfrost@snowman.net</a>> wrote:<br />><br/>> * Fabrízio de Royes Mello (<a href="mailto:fabriziomello@gmail.com">fabriziomello@gmail.com</a>) wrote:<br/> > > * also we discuss about create two new catalogs, one local and another<br />> > shared (likepg_description and pg_shdescription) to track creation times<br />> > of all database objects.<br />><br />>Creating a separate catalog (or two) every time we want to track XYZ for<br /> > all objects is rather overkill... Thinking about this a bit more, and<br />> noting that pg_description/shdescription more-or-less already existas a<br />> framework for tracking 'something' for 'all catalog entries'- why don't<br /> > we just add thesecolumns to those tables..? <br /><br />But those tables are filled only when we execute COMMENT ON statement... thenyour idea is create a 'null' comment every time we create a single object... is it?<br /><br />Regards,<br /><br />--<br/>Fabrízio de Royes Mello<br />Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL<br />>> Blog sobre TI: <a href="http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com">http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com</a><br/>>> Perfil Linkedin: <a href="http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello">http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello</a><br/> >> Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/fabriziomello">http://twitter.com/fabriziomello</a><br/></div>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: