Re: PostgreSQL Timeline
От | MARK CALLAGHAN |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL Timeline |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFbpF8NVSKhVOd62Y+0ttxFwag7ViBP+r0rVs46wa56moxAzZw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL Timeline (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Where are the references that Vertica is sort-of a PG fork and that Paraccel is a PG fork? Quick searches of the interweb finds claims that they are not. Not sure you need to bring doubt to the rest of the details in an excellent slide deck.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ParAccel
http://www.dbms2.com/2008/12/29/paraccel-actually-uses-relatively-little-postgresql-code/
http://www.dbms2.com/2008/03/06/postgresql-can-be-used-in-a-lot-of-different-ways/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ParAccel
http://www.dbms2.com/2008/12/29/paraccel-actually-uses-relatively-little-postgresql-code/
http://www.dbms2.com/2008/03/06/postgresql-can-be-used-in-a-lot-of-different-ways/
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
Damien,
This looks like fun!
I'm not necessarily comfortable with an unqualified link from Ingres to
Postgres; can you make it a dotted line or something? The reason I say
this is that Stonebraker was quite firm that there was no code re-use
from Ingres to Postgres, since he was legally prevented from such copying.
Link to my presentation Elephant Roads, which goes over a bunch of the
commercial forks as of 2009:
http://de.slideshare.net/pgconf/elephant-roads-a-tour-of-postgres-forks
Of course, there's been more since then.
And some earlier ones which I didn't know about, like mSQL (and, by
extension, MySQL).
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list (pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy
Mark Callaghan
mdcallag@gmail.com
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: