Re: temp table security labels
От | Ted Toth |
---|---|
Тема | Re: temp table security labels |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFPpqQFmip5+u_m8RqG3+3mEuT2biQynWWEC+pjqJgpspzkH4Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: temp table security labels (Ted Toth <txtoth@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
seems to me that sepgsql_schema_post_create should be doing a selabel_lookup and using that default label if one exists instead of computing the label ... hmm I'll have to think about it On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 10:44 AM Ted Toth <txtoth@gmail.com> wrote: > > I see it now sepgsql_schema_post_create is doing it ... it's just not > doing what I think it should :( > > On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 8:05 AM Ted Toth <txtoth@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Also AFAICT the schema created for the temp table does not get deleted > > at the end of the session which also causes issues. > > > > On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 7:43 AM Ted Toth <txtoth@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > I'm seeing security labels set on db objects when a temporary table is > > > created but they don't match the labels I've configured in my > > > sepgsql_contexts file. Our code doesn't actually execute a "SECURITY > > > LABEL ..." command for the temp tables but something else must be > > > doing so because I see pg_temp_NNN in pg_seclabels. So I'm confused at > > > how the objects are being labeled, can anyone help me understand how > > > this is happening? > > > > > > Ted
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: