Re: rhel6 rpm file locations
От | Ted Toth |
---|---|
Тема | Re: rhel6 rpm file locations |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFPpqQFNHPLeLpdDq4+6mH1wA6OHirUYU5BJAjsK5Lg2aOTHLQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: rhel6 rpm file locations (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: rhel6 rpm file locations
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Are there any other packagers following the Fedora 'standards' that you are aware of? On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Ted Toth <txtoth@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Ted Toth <txtoth@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I'm trying to use a newer version than is available from RH in our >>>> custom distro but am having problems install both x86_64 and i686 rpms >>>> because file conflicts. We have some i686 packages that use libgdal >>>> which pulls in libpq which ends up in the same location in both the >>>> x86_64 and i686 postgresql lib and devel rpms. Why doesn't postgresql >>>> use _libdir and other standard rpm macros? >>> >>> From where did you get the RPMs that you are using? >>> >>> There is more than one set, and they are maintained by different people. >> >> http://yum.postgresql.org/9.4/redhat/rhel-6.5-x86_64/ > > Those are maintained by Devrim Gunduz and Jeff Frost. Adding them to > the "Cc" list. > > -- > Robert Haas > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: