Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ajin Cherian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Дата
Msg-id CAFPTHDbW-vo3D6+kZudYugZag+PvEKLWGuiw5cdM1Sw6K_yKWA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers


On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 1:35 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 5:03 AM Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Missed the patch - 0001, resending.
>

I have made miscellaneous changes in the patch which includes
improving comments, error messages, and miscellaneous coding
improvements. The most notable one is that we don't need an additional
parameter in walrcv_startstreaming, if the two_phase option is set
properly. My changes are in v63-0002-Misc-changes-by-Amit, if you are
fine with those, then please merge them in the next version. I have
omitted the dev-logs patch but feel free to submit it. I have one
question:


I am fine with these changes. I see that Peter has already merged in these changes.

thanks,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu Australia 

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: a verbose option for autovacuum
Следующее
От: Jan Wieck
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects