Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: Fixed Ascending/Descendingorder in backgrid
От | Khushboo Vashi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: Fixed Ascending/Descendingorder in backgrid |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFOhELf0ChF2fFKtDn9z2u6_+ex1fmbqHiW4pGtzoHDXYoEPZA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: Fixed Ascending/Descendingorder in backgrid (Atira Odhner <aodhner@pivotal.io>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: Fixed Ascending/Descendingorder in backgrid
|
Список | pgadmin-hackers |
Hi Tira,
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Atira Odhner <aodhner@pivotal.io> wrote:
Hi Khushboo,Matt and I took a look at your patch and noticed that there is code duplication between the lines you added and the preceding block of code.Instead of repeating the code in the else block, why not just remove the if condition?
The code in If condition was introduced to handle the sorting of number sequences.
Also, the BigNumber casting in the previous block seems unnecessary since there is no arithmetic, only comparisons happening.
As we get the number and integer cell value into string format, the direct comparison fails.
If we convert string into integer then the long numbers will not get sorted properly; so to handle this the BigNumber casting was used.
It may help to add some jasmine tests around the makeComparator method.Tira & MattOn Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Khushboo Vashi <khushboo.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote: --If this functionality is required then please find the attached fix for the same.Hi,The ascending/descending order is not working in the backgrid while clicking on the headers.Thanks,Khushboo
Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
Thanks,
Khushboo
В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления: