Re: Temporary tables under hot standby
От | Christopher Browne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Temporary tables under hot standby |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFNqd5UMv5WLq_n4Ru_UgDBn0gpX3c4KVURJ1UtaE0JftJpD6g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Temporary tables under hot standby (Michael Nolan <htfoot@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Michael Nolan <htfoot@gmail.com> wrote: > What is the use case for temporary tables on a hot standby server? Simple... We required a "hot standby" server in order to get improved reliability. But we don't want it to sit there chewing power + money, unused. We want to *use* it to support our reporting applications. And the developers used temporary tables to marshal results used in some of those reports. There are conflicting senses of "read-only" here... - In one strict sense, to generate tuples in temp tables means it's not "read only" access. - But since the users running reports aren't allowed to modify the data in the application tables that they are querying, how is that *not* fairly characterized as "read only" access??? -- When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?"
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: