Re: ERROR: volatile EquivalenceClass has no sortref
| От | Ranjeet Dhumal |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: ERROR: volatile EquivalenceClass has no sortref |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFNnw=1xRWG+3ZS8_861XgZ12bXX=vPz__BeDqz93_oW7ph55A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: ERROR: volatile EquivalenceClass has no sortref (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: ERROR: volatile EquivalenceClass has no sortref
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Hi Tom ,
--
--Regards
Ranjeet R. Dhumal
Sorry but i didn't understand that If this is a bug from postgres version then how the same query will be worked if i recreated the tables and with same version of postgres.
On 21 November 2012 19:53, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Alban Hertroys <haramrae@gmail.com> writes:Yes. I seem to recall fixing a bug with exactly this symptom.
>> Ranjeet Dhumal wrote:
> records , am using 9.0.1 version of postgres.
> This is quite possibly your problem: You're 9 bugfix releases behind
> on a .0 release. You should be at 9.0.10 at least.
Please update first, then if the problem is still there you can work
on producing a self-contained test case.
regards, tom lane
--Regards
Ranjeet R. Dhumal
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: