Re: Improving psql \ds
От | Julien Tachoires |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Improving psql \ds |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFEQCbEPjfgOvD9jQFih86uOoH1ZAGLfLCn+CjaP90oQOLS2NQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Improving psql \ds (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Improving psql \ds
Re: Improving psql \ds |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2012/10/8 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Julien Tachoires <julmon@gmail.com> writes: >> About \ds behaviour, I think to add 2 columns : >> - 'LastValue' >> - 'Increment' > > That would make the command a great deal slower, since it would have to > access each sequence to get that info. I don't object to adding such > columns to \ds+, but I don't think it's a good idea to put them in the > basic command. Ok. > The other problem you're going to have here is that there is in fact no > such command as "\ds" (nor "\ds+"); rather, it's a special case of > \dtsvi. As such, putting any relkind-specific info into the result is > problematic. I think you're going to have to invent a different command > if you want there to be sequence-specific columns. Yes, that's why I plan to create a new function listSequences() and call it from src/bin/psql/command.c : + /* \d* commands */ + else if (cmd[0] == 'd') + { ... + case 's': + success = listSequences(pattern, show_verbose); + break; Cheers,
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: