Re: query doesn't always follow 'correct' path..
От | Bert |
---|---|
Тема | Re: query doesn't always follow 'correct' path.. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFCtE1nT_SP-DOrJR0FT2ua4xBxZ5uUGyUnbiNV7VVXA9b8pqQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: query doesn't always follow 'correct' path.. (Bert <biertie@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: query doesn't always follow 'correct' path..
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
Hello,
Thanks the nice people on irc my problem is fixed. default_statistics_target = 5000 -> and I analyzed the tables after the change of course -> now I only got 2 plans anymore, in stead of 3
cpu_tuple_cost = 0.1 -> by setting this value the seq scans were stopped, and the better index_only scan / bitmap index scan were used for this query.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Bert <biertie@gmail.com> wrote:
BertI have also run the query with set seq_scan to off, and then I get the following output:I also don't get any difference in the query plans when they are run in the morning, or in the evening.Hello,The last statistics were collected yesterday evening. I collected statistics about the statistics, and I found the following:
yes, the tables are vacuumed every day with the following command: vacuum analyze schema.table.
table_name; starttime; runtime
"st_itemseat";"2013-02-17 23:48:42";"00:01:02"
"st_itemseat_45";"2013-02-17 23:35:15";"00:00:08"
"st_itemzone";"2013-02-17 23:35:33";"00:00:01"st_itemseat_45 is a child-partition of st_itemseat.They seem to be pretty much up to date I guess?
Total query runtime: 12025 ms.
20599 rows retrieved.These are 3 different plans. And the last one is blazingly fast. That's the one I would always want to use :-)it's also weird that this is default plan for the biggest partition. But the smaller the partition gets, the smaller the partition gets.So I don't think it has anything to do with the memory settings. Since it already chooses this plan for the bigger partitions...
wkr,On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Frank Lanitz <frank@frank.uvena.de> wrote:Am 18.02.2013 10:43, schrieb Bert:> Does anyone has an idea what triggers this bad plan, and how I can fix it?Looks a bit like wrong statistics. Are the statistiks for your tables
correct?
Cheers,
Frank
--
Sent via pgsql-sql mailing list (pgsql-sql@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-sql
--
Bert Desmet
0477/305361
--
Bert Desmet
0477/305361
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: