Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum?
От | John Naylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFBsxsHbn4atCHRFXtKQs4FWUhaErdvXa1fX_nouq70pUiC8tw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum? (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 4:48 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:43 AM John Naylor > <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > I'll put some effort in finding any way that it might not be robust. > > After that, changing the message and docs is trivial. > > It would be great to be able to totally drop the idea of using > single-user mode before Postgres 15 feature freeze. How's that going? Unfortunately, I was distracted from this work for a time, and just as I had intended to focus on it during March, I was out sick for 2-3 weeks. I gather from subsequent discussion that a full solution goes beyond just a new warning message and documentation. Either way I'm not quite prepared to address this in time for v15. > I suggest that we apply the following patch as part of that work. It > adds one last final failsafe check at the point that VACUUM makes a > final decision on rel truncation. That is one thing that was in the back of my mind, and it seems reasonable to me. -- John Naylor EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: