Re: Considering additional sort specialisation functions for PG16
От | John Naylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Considering additional sort specialisation functions for PG16 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFBsxsH9bQ+wXJc_C4KiRR7FQ8Fbz=N5fHCjbRWmaW=v+nQJaw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Considering additional sort specialisation functions for PG16 (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Considering additional sort specialisation functions for PG16
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 11:24 AM David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 at 15:22, John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > Did you happen to see > > > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFBsxsFhq8VUSkUL5YO17cFXbCPwtbbxBu%2Bd9MFrrsssfDXm3Q%40mail.gmail.com > > I missed that. It looks like a much more promising idea than what I > came up with. I've not looked at your code yet, but I'm interested and > will aim to look soon. Note that I haven't actually implemented this idea yet, just tried to model the effects by lobotomizing the current comparators. I think it's worth pursuing and will try to come back to it this cycle, but if you or anyone else wants to try, that's fine of course. -- John Naylor EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: