On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 11:23 AM John Naylor <
john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 5:46 PM David Rowley <
dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I didn't do a detailed review of the sort patch, but I did wonder
> > about the use of the name "fallback" in the new functions. The
> > comment in the following snippet from qsort_tuple_unsigned_compare()
> > makes me think "tiebreak" is a better name.
>
> I agree "tiebreak" is better.
Here is v3 with that change. I still need to make sure the tests cover all cases, so I'll do that as time permits. Also creating CF entry.
--
John Naylor
EDB:
http://www.enterprisedb.com