Re: disfavoring unparameterized nested loops
От | John Naylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: disfavoring unparameterized nested loops |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFBsxsGYd0kYx_C80LuHNE1=fQdpNA9McFEF9hA+=MrwwowZ4g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: disfavoring unparameterized nested loops (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 6:20 AM Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have not come across many papers which leverage this idea. Googling
> "selectivity estimation confidence interval", does not yield many
> papers. Although I found [1] to be using a similar idea. So may be
> there's not merit in this idea, thought theoretically it sounds fine
> to me.
>
>
> [1] https://pi3.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/~moer/Publications/vldb18_smpl_synop.pdf
Well, that paper's title shows it's a bit too far forward for us, since we don't use samples during plan time (although that's a separate topic worth considering). From the references, however, this one gives some mathematical framing of the problem that lead to the thread subject, although I haven't read enough to see if we can get practical advice from it:
> "selectivity estimation confidence interval", does not yield many
> papers. Although I found [1] to be using a similar idea. So may be
> there's not merit in this idea, thought theoretically it sounds fine
> to me.
>
>
> [1] https://pi3.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/~moer/Publications/vldb18_smpl_synop.pdf
Well, that paper's title shows it's a bit too far forward for us, since we don't use samples during plan time (although that's a separate topic worth considering). From the references, however, this one gives some mathematical framing of the problem that lead to the thread subject, although I haven't read enough to see if we can get practical advice from it:
Y. E. Ioannidis and S. Christodoulakis. On the propagation of errors in the size of join results.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: