Re: badly calculated width of emoji in psql
От | John Naylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: badly calculated width of emoji in psql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFBsxsG39ZQNKDQpE3Yu6rytemsCk8naJ9ib=WyiSUia24_3qw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: badly calculated width of emoji in psql (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: badly calculated width of emoji in psql
Re: badly calculated width of emoji in psql |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 10:45 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 05:13:31PM -0400, John Naylor wrote:
> > I'm a bit concerned about the build dependencies not working right, but
> > it's not clear it's even due to the patch. I'll spend some time
> > investigating next week.
>
> How large do libpgcommon deliverables get with this patch? Skimming
> through the patch, that just looks like a couple of bytes, still.
More like a couple thousand bytes. That's because the width of mbinterval doubled. If this is not desirable, we could teach the scripts to adjust the width of the interval type depending on the largest character they saw.
--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: