Re: A qsort template
От | John Naylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A qsort template |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFBsxsFRYNL-XgXqY0mddxCGSAepE=zY3VT9vggFANdZwQT4pQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A qsort template (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: A qsort template
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 5:43 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes: > > On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 1:12 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote: > >> Should these debug lines be removed ? > >> > >> elog(DEBUG1, "qsort_tuple"); > > > I agree -- DEBUG1 seems too chatty for something like this. DEBUG2 > > would be more appropriate IMV. Though I don't feel very strongly about > > it. > > Given the lack of context identification, I'd put the usefulness of > these in production at close to zero. +1 for removing them > altogether, or failing that, downgrade to DEBUG5 or so. I agree this is only useful in development. Removal sounds fine to me, so I'll do that soon. -- John Naylor EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: