Re: document pg_settings view doesn't display custom options
От | John Naylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: document pg_settings view doesn't display custom options |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFBsxsEj6cYvKUkkY3OBNS23t2u8_1bwBreC8yAMWMAikiUD+A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: document pg_settings view doesn't display custom options (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: document pg_settings view doesn't display custom options
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 12:07 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 11:51 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
> wrote:
>> Also I think this note should be in the different paragraph from the
>> paragraph
>> of "The pg_settings view cannot be inserted into or deleted from...."
>> because
>> they are different topics. Thought?
> Agreed on both points. In a separate paragraph, I think it's awkward to
> start two consecutive sentences with "The pg_settings view". If we put it
> in the previous paragraph we could phrase it like this:
> "See Section 20.1 for more information about the various ways to change
> these parameters. Customized options are not displayed until the
> extension module that defines them has been loaded.
That just moves the subject-inconsistency to a different para :-(
I think this item should be its own new para.
As for the repetitiveness, we could just say "This view ...", in one or
even both paras.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: