Re: Faster way of upgrading postgresql to 10 from 9.5
От | Debraj Manna |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Faster way of upgrading postgresql to 10 from 9.5 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAF6DVKPFky-+MpBQH8h-FM7--fyhk6unL56FbuKezobaoAijLw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Faster way of upgrading postgresql to 10 from 9.5 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Faster way of upgrading postgresql to 10 from 9.5
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
What profiling will help in this case?
Sent from GMail on Android
On Nov 25, 2017 8:49 PM, "Tom Lane" wrote:
> Debraj Manna writes:
> > Is this time expected? I mean 17 minutes for 490 GB. I could not find any
> > benchmark for pg_upgrade.
>
> It seems awfully slow, if you're using -k. That switch should remove any
> dependency on the data size, but what remains is the number of SQL objects
> (databases, tables, functions, etc). If you've got tens or hundreds of
> thousands of those, maybe this would be a reasonable time.
>
> As Alvaro said, it's possible that you're hitting some fixable bottleneck;
> but to identify what that is we'd need some profiling information.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: