Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscription

> I've tried to compile this patch with current state of master (commit

> 51c3e9fade76c12)  and found out that, when configured with --enable-cassert,

> it doesn't pass make check.

Thanks for the feedback. Yes, unexpectedly for me, `ExecEvalExpr` can return

expanded `jbvArray` and `jbvObject` instead `jbvBinary` in both cases. It's

interesting, that this doesn't break anything, but obviously violates

the `pushJsonbValueScalar` semantics. I don't think `ExecEvalExpr` should be

changed for jsonb, we can handle this situation in `pushJsonbValue` instead. I've

attached a new version of patch with this modification.

On 27 September 2016 at 19:08, Victor Wagner <vitus@wagner.pp.ru> wrote:

On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 18:29:23 +0700
Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Regarding to the previous conversations [1], [2], here is a patch
> (with some improvements from Nikita Glukhov) for the generic type
> subscription. It allows
> to define type-specific subscription logic for any data type and has
> implementations for the array and jsonb types. There are following
> changes in this
> patch:

I've tried to compile this patch with current state of master (commit
51c3e9fade76c12)  and found out that, when configured with
--enable-cassert, it doesn't pass make check.

LOG:  server process (PID 4643) was terminated by signal 6: Aborted
DETAIL:  Failed process was running:
update test_jsonb_subscript set test_json['a'] = '{"b":
1}'::jsonb;



--
 Victor


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers