Re: refactoring basebackup.c
| От | Suraj Kharage |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: refactoring basebackup.c |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAF1DzPXUHatb7HXETu-u6=n+gyzut_=zORCZgFs-7H=eUEQEug@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: refactoring basebackup.c (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: refactoring basebackup.c
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 7:49 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
So the patch came out slightly faster at 8kB and slightly slower in the other tests. That's kinda strange. I wonder if it's just noise. How much do the results vary run to run?
It is not varying much except for 8kB run. Please see below details for both runs of each scenario.
| 8kb | 32kb (default value) | 128kB | 1024kB | ||
| WIthout refactor patch | 1st run | real 10m50.924s user 1m29.774s sys 9m13.058s | real 8m36.245s user 1m8.471s sys 7m21.520s | real 7m8.690s user 0m54.840s sys 6m1.725s | real 18m16.898s user 1m39.105s sys 9m42.803s |
| 2nd run | real 10m22.718s user 1m23.629s sys 8m51.410s | real 8m44.455s user 1m7.896s sys 7m28.909s | real 6m54.299s user 0m55.690s sys 5m46.502s | real 18m3.511s user 1m38.197s sys 9m36.517s | |
| WIth refactor patch | 1st run | real 10m11.350s user 1m25.038s sys 8m39.226s | real 8m56.226s user 1m9.774s sys 7m41.032s | real 7m26.678s user 0m54.833s sys 6m20.057s | real 19m5.218s user 1m44.122s sys 10m17.623s |
| 2nd run | real 11m30.500s user 1m45.221s sys 9m37.815s | real 9m4.103s user 1m6.893s sys 7m49.393s | real 7m26.713s user 0m54.868s sys 6m19.652s | real 18m17.230s user 1m42.749s sys 9m53.704s |
--
Thanks & Regards,
Suraj kharage,
EnterpriseDB Corporation,
The Postgres Database Company.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: