Re: Bug : FAST_NUMBER_FAILED when getting NaN on BigDecimal
От | Florent Guillaume |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug : FAST_NUMBER_FAILED when getting NaN on BigDecimal |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAF-4BpPTHo3zXV_hk8Yy_3MHrz2c5KUeeohyzjjVzUHuFtOF3A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug : FAST_NUMBER_FAILED when getting NaN on BigDecimal ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug : FAST_NUMBER_FAILED when getting NaN on BigDecimal
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote: > DocSea - Patrice Delorme <pdelorme@docsea.com> wrote: > >> It is impossible to fetch data when numeric value in database is >> NaN >> It throws FAST_NUMBER_FAILED >> (postgresql-jdbc-9.1-902:AbstractJdbc2ResultSet:2176) because my >> value is not numeric (NaN). >> This is incorect behaviour since 'NaN' is a legal value in >> postgres for numeric type. > > How do you expect what you read to be represented in Java? java.lang.Double.NaN I guess. -- Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM) http://www.nuxeo.com http://www.nuxeo.org +33 1 40 33 79 87
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: