Re: Why we lost Uber as a user
| От | Geoff Winkless |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Why we lost Uber as a user |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAEzk6fenkdBOLnc4rZPo+Q2sgcRWDEo08qKdBvc-V8Rvw9fnEA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Why we lost Uber as a user (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Why we lost Uber as a user
Re: Why we lost Uber as a user |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Well, their big complaint about binary replication is that a bug can
spread from a master to all slaves, which doesn't happen with statement
level replication.
I'm not sure that that makes sense to me. If there's a database bug that occurs when you run a statement on the master, it seems there's a decent chance that that same bug is going to occur when you run the same statement on the slave.Obviously it depends on the type of bug and how identical the slave is, but statement-level replication certainly doesn't preclude such a bug from propagating.
Geoff
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: