Re: Proposal to use JSON for Postgres Parser format
От | Matthias van de Meent |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal to use JSON for Postgres Parser format |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEze2WjPPb4wQdRyPp-K9vmBbZVUaVQCDULCpaohN_i5R1fV4g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal to use JSON for Postgres Parser format (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal to use JSON for Postgres Parser format
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 at 13:46, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 4:27 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: >> On 2022-10-27 Th 19:38, Andres Freund wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On 2022-09-19 22:29:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> >> Maybe a compromise could be found whereby we provide a conversion function >> >> that converts whatever the catalog storage format is to some JSON >> >> equivalent. That would address the needs of external code that doesn't want >> >> to write a custom parser, while not tying us directly to JSON. >> > +1 >> >> Agreed. > > +1 > > Michel, it seems that you now have a green light to implement node to > json function. I think that Tom's proposal that we +1 is on a pg_node_tree to json SQL function / cast; which is tangentially related to the "nodeToJson / changing the storage format of pg_node_tree to json" proposal, but not the same. I will add my +1 to Tom's proposal for that function/cast, but I'm not sure on changing the storage format of pg_node_tree to json. Kind regards, Matthias van de Meent
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: