Re: Table AM Interface Enhancements
От | Matthias van de Meent |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Table AM Interface Enhancements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEze2WjC5PiweG-4oe0hB_Zr59iF3tRE1gURm8w4Cg5b6JEBGw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Table AM Interface Enhancements (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Table AM Interface Enhancements
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 12:34, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote: > > You're right. No sense trying to fix this. Reverted. I just noticed that this revert (commit 6377e12a) seems to have introduced two comment blocks atop TableAmRoutine's scan_analyze_next_block, and I can't find a clear reason why these are two separate comment blocks. Furthermore, both comment blocks seemingly talk about different implementations of a block-based analyze functionality, and I don't have the time to analyze which of these comments is authorative and which are misplaced or obsolete. Kind regards, Matthias van de Meent Neon (https://neon.tech)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: