Re: Optimizing nbtree ScalarArrayOp execution, allowing multi-column ordered scans, skip scan
От | Matthias van de Meent |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Optimizing nbtree ScalarArrayOp execution, allowing multi-column ordered scans, skip scan |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEze2Wj-EBt8ECp7QScx5bBw4VNg=9T==o=Yh=gUR4__C3h=uA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Optimizing nbtree ScalarArrayOp execution, allowing multi-column ordered scans, skip scan (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
Ответы |
Re: Optimizing nbtree ScalarArrayOp execution, allowing multi-column ordered scans, skip scan
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 00:03, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 1:28 PM Matthias van de Meent > <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm planning on reviewing this patch tomorrow, but in an initial scan > > through the patch I noticed there's little information about how the > > array keys state machine works in this new design. Do you have a more > > toplevel description of the full state machine used in the new design? > > This is an excellent question. You're entirely right: there isn't > enough information about the design of the state machine. > > I should be able to post v6 later this week. My current plan is to > commit the other nbtree patch first (the backwards scan "boundary > cases" one from the ongoing CF) -- since I saw your review earlier > today. I think that you should probably wait for this v6 before > starting your review. Okay, thanks for the update, then I'll wait for v6 to be posted. Kind regards, Matthias van de Meent Neon (https://neon.tech)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: