Re: pg_stat_progress_create_index vs. parallel index builds
От | Matthias van de Meent |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_stat_progress_create_index vs. parallel index builds |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEze2WgJ8qfOkvpQqDCNXww5WxXy5Y0qLafziJXPjA2SP2vCwA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_stat_progress_create_index vs. parallel index builds (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_stat_progress_create_index vs. parallel index builds
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 17:42, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > On 6/2/21 4:54 PM, Matthias van de Meent wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 15:23, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > >> > >> ... > >> > > > > After looking at it a bit more, it seems like a solution was actually > > easier than I'd expected. PFA a prototype (unvalidated, but > > check-world -ed) patch that would add these subphases of progress > > reporting, which can be backpatched down to 12. > > > > Nice. I gave it a try on the database I'm experimenting with, and it > seems to be working fine. Please add it to the next CF. Thanks, cf available here: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/33/3149/ With regards, Matthias van de Meent
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: