Re: [HACKERS] patch proposal
| От | Venkata B Nagothi |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] patch proposal |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAEyp7J_+u0PKgUaR10eUcjJ=v5aHc8Ui4b_9L1gbuEttcCwtkQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] patch proposal (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 4:49 AM, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
> On 1/27/17 3:19 AM, Venkata B Nagothi wrote:
>> I have split the patch into two different
>> pieces. One is to determine if the recovery can start at all and other
>> patch deals with the incomplete recovery situation.
>
> I think the first patch looks promising and I would rather work through
> that before considering the second patch. Once there are tests for the
> first patch I will complete my review.
Based on that, I am moving the patch to next CF with "Needs Review".
Venkata, please be careful in updating correctly the patch status, it
was still on "Waiting on Author".
Apologies. Sure. Will make a note.
Regards,
Venkata B N
Database Consultant
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: