Re: [HACKERS] Range Partitioning behaviour - query
От | Venkata B Nagothi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Range Partitioning behaviour - query |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEyp7J-qu=O5g81+=g0a4YcZffmVGguOPPQMObwEks+yDLCTDQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Range Partitioning behaviour - query ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:38 PM, David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2017/02/24 8:38, Venkata B Nagothi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
>> Upper bound of a range partition is an exclusive bound. A note was added
>> recently to the CREATE TABLE page to make this clear.
>>
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/sql-createtable .html
>
>
> Thanks. Actually, my confusion was that the upper bound value would be
> included when "TO" clause is used in the syntax.
Hmm, TO sounds like it implies inclusive.I think most common usage of the word ends up being inclusive but the word itself doesn't really care.Dictionary.com has a good example:"We work from nine to five." - you leave at the beginning of the 5 o'clock hour (I'm going for casual usage here)
True.
Since our implementation of ranges is half-open the usage here is consistent with that concept. That it doesn't match BETWEEN is actually somewhat nice since you can use ranges for half-open and BETWEEN if you want to be concise with fully-closed endpoints. But it is one more thing to remember.
Agreed.
Regards,
Venkata B N
Database Consultant
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: