Re: [GENERAL] pgcon2015, what happened to SMR disk technolgy ?
| От | Laurent Laborde |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [GENERAL] pgcon2015, what happened to SMR disk technolgy ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAEy3c_RMHYHCYzQnfFhs6FZAoWbhrsKomterF3Aj0A+DQA4gtg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] pgcon2015, what happened to SMR disk technolgy ? (Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin@geoff.dj>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] pgcon2015, what happened to SMR disk technolgy ?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin@geoff.dj> wrote:
What's the point of the seagate archive now ?Ironwolf, for the same public price, have better performance (obviously) and, more surprising, a better MTBF.I have no real insight into whether Seagate are still pursuing the product design, but I'm not really surprised that the MTBF is worse: if the shingled disk must write some tracks twice for each individual track write, it seems logical that there will be more write stress and therefore shortened lifespan, no?
I contacted seagate and just got a reply : they don't have strategic information to share about SMR technology at the moment.
I guess i saw it coming ^^
Laurent "ker2x" Laborde
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: