Re: [BackendXidGetPid] only access allProcs when xid matches
От | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BackendXidGetPid] only access allProcs when xid matches |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAExHW5voH=E3N3n8fWn03O5BaNZGwnM83XZLc3U4hEsP=jpMhg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BackendXidGetPid] only access allProcs when xid matches (Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BackendXidGetPid] only access allProcs when xid matches
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Please add this to commitfest so that it's not forgotten. On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 8:37 PM Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 10:46 PM Ashutosh Bapat > <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 9:30 AM Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > In function `BackendXidGetPid`, when looping every proc's > > > TransactionId, there is no need to access its PGPROC since there > > > is shared memory access: `arrayP->pgprocnos[index]`. > > > > > > Though the compiler can optimize this kind of inefficiency, I > > > believe we should ship with better code. > > > > > > > Looks good to me. However, I would just move the variable declaration > > with their assignments inside the if () rather than combing the > > expressions. It more readable that way. > > yeah, make sense, also checked elsewhere using the original style, > attachment file > keep that style, thanks ;) > > > > > -- > > Best Wishes, > > Ashutosh Bapat > > > > -- > Regards > Junwang Zhao -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: