Re: Use RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP where possible
| От | Ashutosh Bapat |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Use RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP where possible |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAExHW5v+eWp0dVg4e-_d9-7Z4HSQYKK6iZ5JsFeHyBK-WGHE_w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Use RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP where possible (Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Use RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP where possible
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 5:12 AM Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Nathan,
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 12:30 AM Nathan Bossart
<nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 12:07:35AM +0800, Junwang Zhao wrote:
> > All other files perform this check using RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP.
> > Should we update tablecmds.c to do the same for consistency?
>
> Seems like a good idea.
Thanks for the comment.
I have attached a patch with the proposed changes.
LGTM. I looked at other instances of is_localtemp, but none of them have (relation)->rd_rel->relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_TEMP there. Your patch has covered all the existing ones.
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: