Re: Report bytes and transactions actually sent downtream

On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 2:38 PM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 12:47 PM Ashutosh Bapat
> <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 10:12 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I tested the flows with
> > > a) logical replication slot and get-changes.
> > > b) filtered data flows: pub-sub creation with row_filters, 'publish'
> > > options. I tried to verify plugin fields as compared to total_wal*
> > > fields.
> > > c) reset flow.
> > >
> > > While tests for a and c are present already. I don't see tests for b
> > > anywhere when it comes to stats. Do you think we shall add a test for
> > > filtered data using row-filter somewhere?
> >
> > Added a test in 028_row_filter. Please find it in the attached
> > patchset.
>
> Test looks good.

Thanks. Added to three more files. I think we have covered all the
cases where filtering can occur.

PFA patches.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat