Re: anonymous unions (C11)
От | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: anonymous unions (C11) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAExHW5tcypg4JV0mrcZXCKUFMgQbkOtTNu1iSe8uOqDBW=+ODg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: anonymous unions (C11) (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: anonymous unions (C11)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 5:14 PM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> wrote: > > On 2025-Sep-30, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > > > Attached patch fixes those errors for me. > > > diff --git a/src/common/cryptohash.c b/src/common/cryptohash.c > > index fc0555d2f99..e8a35c2ec35 100644 > > --- a/src/common/cryptohash.c > > +++ b/src/common/cryptohash.c > > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ struct pg_cryptohash_ctx > > pg_sha256_ctx sha256; > > pg_sha384_ctx sha384; > > pg_sha512_ctx sha512; > > - } data; > > + }; > > }; > > Isn't this patch 0015 in Peter's series? I found the compilation errors after pulling the latest sources at that time. I thought the patch series is committed and hence this report and patch. Didn't look at the patch series. But the problematic commit has been reverted since then. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: