Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)
| От | Ranier Vilela |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAEudQArZXwJsGrNjoLCcs84grBB_erFpcP1W9WZUfvSHPEMCSA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD) (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD)
Re: Windows regress fails (latest HEAD) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Em qui., 11 de jun. de 2020 às 10:01, Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> escreveu:
On 6/11/20 8:52 AM, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Hi,
> Latest HEAD, fails with windows regress tests.
>
> float8 ... FAILED 517 ms
> partition_prune ... FAILED 3085 ms
>
>
The first thing you should do when you find this is to see if there is a
buildfarm report of the failure. If there isn't then try to work out why.
Sorry, I will have to research the buildfarm, I have no reference to it.
Also, when making a report like this, it is essential to let us know
things like:
* which commit is causing the failure (git bisect is good for finding
this)
Thanks for hit (git bisect).
* what Windows version you're testing on
Windows 10 (2004)
* which compiler you're using
msvc 2019 (64 bits)
* which configuration settings you're using
None. Only build with default configuration (release is default).
* what are the regression differences you get in the failing tests
It was sent as an attachment.
regards,
Ranier Vilela
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: