Re: Improve list manipulation in several places
От | Ranier Vilela |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Improve list manipulation in several places |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEudQArQSosP9qNR62M6_44t_iicQ4f9JAWmB5nriRccx-TfeQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Improve list manipulation in several places (Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Improve list manipulation in several places
Re: Improve list manipulation in several places |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Em sex., 21 de abr. de 2023 às 04:34, Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> escreveu:
There was discussion in [1] about improvements to list manipulation in
several places. But since the discussion is not related to the topic in
that thread, fork a new thread here and attach a patch to show my
thoughts.
Some are just cosmetic changes by using macros. The others should have
performance gain from the avoidance of moving list entries. But I doubt
the performance gain can be noticed or measured, as currently there are
only a few places affected by the change. I still think the changes are
worthwhile though, because it is very likely that future usage of the
same scenario can benefit from these changes.
+1
Perhaps list_delete_nth_cell needs to check NIL too?
+ if (list == NIL)
+ return NIL;
+ return NIL;
+lcons_copy(void *datum, const List *list)
+lappend_copy(const List *list, void *datum)
list param pointer can be const here not?
regards,
Ranier Vilela
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: