Re: Avoid unecessary MemSet call (src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c)
От | Ranier Vilela |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Avoid unecessary MemSet call (src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEudQArKO9KNAkisS0Zb73bLDL2i9=w+s1dxr6NDTcd+3jaL-w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Avoid unecessary MemSet call (src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c) (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Avoid unecessary MemSet call (src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Em seg., 16 de mai. de 2022 às 20:26, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> escreveu:
On Sun, 15 May 2022 at 09:47, Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> wrote:
> At function load_relcache_init_file, there is an unnecessary function call,
> to initialize pgstat_info pointer to NULL.
>
> MemSet(&rel->pgstat_info, 0, sizeof(rel->pgstat_info));
What seems to have happened here is the field was changed to become a
pointer in 77947c51c. It's not incorrect to use MemSet() to zero out
the pointer field. What it does probably do is confuse the casual
reader into thinking the field is a struct rather than a pointer to
one. It's probably worth making that consistent with the other
fields so nobody gets confused.
Can you add a CF entry for PG16 for this so we come back to it after we branch?
Of course.
I will add it.
regards,
Ranier Vilela
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: