Re: Improve the granularity of PQsocketPoll's timeout parameter?
От | Ranier Vilela |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Improve the granularity of PQsocketPoll's timeout parameter? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEudQAq=mvmc-hD4+URdsL5nkq7PTJBCSQ3oLKqtiPMe7HkVHA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Improve the granularity of PQsocketPoll's timeout parameter? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Improve the granularity of PQsocketPoll's timeout parameter?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Em qui., 13 de jun. de 2024 às 12:25, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> escreveu:
Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm unsure if the documentation matches the code?
> " connect_timeout #
> <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/libpq-connect.html#LIBPQ-CONNECT-CONNECT-TIMEOUT>
> Maximum time to wait while connecting, in seconds (write as a decimal
> integer, e.g., 10). Zero, negative, or not specified means wait
> indefinitely. The minimum allowed timeout is 2 seconds, therefore a value
> of 1 is interpreted as 2. This timeout applies separately to each host name
> or IP address. For example, if you specify two hosts and connect_timeout is
> 5, each host will time out if no connection is made within 5 seconds, so
> the total time spent waiting for a connection might be up to 10 seconds.
> "
> The comments says that timeout = 0, means *Timeout is immediate (no
> blocking)*
> Does the word "indefinitely" mean infinite?
> If yes, connect_timeout = -1, mean infinite?
The sentence about "minimum allowed timeout is 2 seconds" has to go
away, but the rest of that seems fine.
But now that you mention it, we could drop the vestigial
>> if (timeout < 0)
>> timeout = 0;
as well, because the rest of the function only applies the timeout
when "timeout > 0". Otherwise end_time (nee finish_time) stays at -1.
I think that's OK Tom.
+1 for push.
best regards,
Ranier Vilela
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: