Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c)
От | Ranier Vilela |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEudQAq335uXPXF+cNa67xvat3iTDOFR6Jgi9TXsfKRQ5_5O_Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c)
Re: Eval expression R/O once time (src/backend/executor/execExpr.c) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Em ter., 21 de set. de 2021 às 19:21, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> escreveu:
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2021-09-21 15:09:11 -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>> Currently when determining where CoerceToDomainValue can be read,
>> it evaluates every step in a loop.
>> But, I think that the expression is immutable and should be solved only
>> once.
> What is immutable here?
I think Ranier has a point here. The clear intent of this bit:
/*
* If first time through, determine where CoerceToDomainValue
* nodes should read from.
*/
if (domainval == NULL)
{
is that we only need to emit the EEOP_MAKE_READONLY once when there are
multiple CHECK constraints. But because domainval has the wrong lifespan,
that test is constant-true, and we'll do it over each time to little
purpose.
Exactly, thanks for the clear explanation.
> And it has to, the allocation intentionally is separate for each
> constraint. As the comment even explicitly says:
> /*
> * Since value might be read multiple times, force to R/O
> * - but only if it could be an expanded datum.
> */
No, what that's on about is that each constraint might contain multiple
VALUE symbols. But once we've R/O-ified the datum, we can keep using
it across VALUE symbols in different CHECK expressions, not just one.
(AFAICS anyway)
I'm unexcited by the proposed move of the save_innermost_domainval/null
variables, though. It adds no correctness and it forces an additional
level of indentation of a good deal of code, as the patch fails to show.
Ok, but I think that still has a value in reducing the scope.
save_innermost_domainval and save_innermost_domainnull,
only are needed with DOM_CONSTRAINT_CHECK expressions,
and both are declared even when they will not be used.
Anyway, the v1 patch fixes only the expression eval.
regards,
Ranier Vilela
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: