Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL: WolfSSL support
| От | Ranier Vilela |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL: WolfSSL support |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAEudQApG4d4MJFehrj1YFvrC-8U7ocMsrDsEF8MDAN2oz=mOJA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL: WolfSSL support (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL: WolfSSL support
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Em sáb., 27 de jun. de 2020 às 16:40, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> escreveu:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 04:22:51PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Em sáb., 27 de jun. de 2020 às 09:50, Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
> escreveu:
>
> Re: Peter Eisentraut
> > What would be the advantage of using wolfSSL over OpenSSL?
>
> Avoiding the OpenSSL-vs-GPL linkage problem with readline.
>
> I'm curious, how do you intend to solve a linking problem with
> OpenSSL-vs-GPL-readline, with another GPL product?
I assume you can use wolfSSL as long as the result is GPL, which is the
same requirement libreadline causes for Postgres, particularly if
Postgres is statically linked to libreadline.
I don't want to divert the focus from the theread, but this subject has a controversial potential, in my opinion.
I participated in a speech on another list, where I make contributions (IUP library: https://www.tecgraf.puc-rio.br/iup/).
I participated in a speech on another list, where I make contributions (IUP library: https://www.tecgraf.puc-rio.br/iup/).
Where a user, upon discovering that two sub-libraries, were GPL licenses, caused an uproar, bringing the speech to Mr.Stallman himself.
In short, the best thing for the project will be to remove the two GPL sub-libraries.
In short, the best thing for the project will be to remove the two GPL sub-libraries.
regards,
Ranier Vilela
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: