Re: REPACK and naming
| От | Ranier Vilela |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: REPACK and naming |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAEudQAo7AgiGnvoCNM7c9HZwwiadDYHeme7Kft1g9ZpG4bzs0Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | REPACK and naming (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: REPACK and naming
Re: REPACK and naming |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Em ter., 16 de set. de 2025 às 13:40, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> escreveu:
I am starting to get worried about the confusing of adding a REPACK
command. We already have a lot of confusion around vacuum and analyze:
* autoanalyze does vacuum and analyze
* VACUUM FULL is much different from VACUUM
It seems if we add REPACK as a command, it is somewhere between VACUUM
FULL and VACUUM in severity/impact. Should we be rethinking the naming
in this area?
SqlServer has similar feature.
SHRINK
best regards,
Ranier Vilela
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: