Re: postgresql v11.1 Segmentation fault: signal 11: by runningSELECT... JIT Issue?
От | pabloa98 |
---|---|
Тема | Re: postgresql v11.1 Segmentation fault: signal 11: by runningSELECT... JIT Issue? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEjudX7=Lvwh+viagYetGJKMQgKMGinrPQTshhgAQXCd=eeAog@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: postgresql v11.1 Segmentation fault: signal 11: by running SELECT... JIT Issue? (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: postgresql v11.1 Segmentation fault: signal 11: by runningSELECT... JIT Issue?
Re: postgresql v11.1 Segmentation fault: signal 11: by running SELECT... JIT Issue? |
Список | pgsql-general |
I did not modify it.
I guess I should make it bigger than 1765. is 2400 or 3200 fine?
My apologies if my questions look silly. I do not know about the internal format of the database.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:58 PM Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> wrote:
>>>>> "pabloa98" == pabloa98 <pabloa98@gmail.com> writes:
pabloa98> the table baseline_denull has 1765 columns,
Uhh...
#define MaxHeapAttributeNumber 1600 /* 8 * 200 */
Did you modify that?
(The back of my envelope says that on 64bit, the largest usable t_hoff
would be 248, of which 23 is fixed overhead leaving 225 as the max null
bitmap size, giving a hard limit of 1800 for MaxTupleAttributeNumber and
1799 for MaxHeapAttributeNumber. And the concerns expressed in the
comments above those #defines would obviously apply.)
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: