Re: Upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 in place, same machine
От | Jonathan Nalley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 in place, same machine |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEiqQGbcHAqYvoGh2XnMD+n2UG57Dk7b0861te5go+ye7mHgPA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 in place, same machine (Wells Oliver <wellsoliver@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 in place, same machine
Re: Upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 in place, same machine |
Список | pgsql-admin |
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Wells Oliver <wellsoliver@gmail.com> wrote: > I have 9.1 running on 5432, and 9.2 running on 5433. The 9.1 database size > is 153g. 9.1 is actively used by systems, 9.2 is just sitting there empty. > > I'd like to move the 9.1 database to 9.2 without any down time, and ensuring > that no data is lost. > > My original idea was to make 9.2 a slave of 9.1, then switch it over. > > Is there a better idea? Thanks for any tips. have you looked at simply using pg_upgrade ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/pgupgrade.html > > -- > Wells Oliver > wellsoliver@gmail.com
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: