Re: [GENERAL] why isn't this subquery wrong?

thanks all!

On Apr 20, 2017, at 6:42 PM, David G. Johnston wrote:

​Subqueries can see all columns of the parent.  When the subquery actually uses one of them it is called a "correlated subquery".

i thought a correlated subquery had to note that table/alias, not a raw column.   I guess i've just been adhering to good form.

On Apr 20, 2017, at 6:43 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

Cautious SQL programmers qualify all references inside sub-selects to avoid getting caught by this accidentally.

is there a syntax to qualify a reference to lock a subquery to the current scope (disable looking at the parents)?  that's how I got caught on this by accident.