Re: Condition variable live lock
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Condition variable live lock |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEepm=3MAW-LVDPmF+6nAUewC3_8mD3gcUPi-VrdBWnCQh7Qrw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Condition variable live lock (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Condition variable live lock
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I wrote: >> Actually ... perhaps a better design would be to have >> ConditionVariable[PrepareTo]Sleep auto-cancel any prepared sleep for >> a different condition variable, analogously to what we just did in >> ConditionVariableBroadcast, on the same theory that whenever control >> returns to the other CV wait loop it can re-establish the relevant >> state easily enough. I have to think that if the use of CVs grows >> much, the existing restriction is going to become untenable anyway, >> so why not just get rid of it? > > Concretely, as per attached. +1 for the idea. Haven't looked at the code yet but I'll review this and the proclist patch shortly. -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: