Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEepm=33AdVUK9t1yk2QbA11QJQV31WHbL=AhUOqE46fktcz-g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > Do you think that using barrier's will simplify the patch as compared > to using condition variables because in that case, it will make sense > to use barriers? It would work, but I suppose you might call it overkill. If they were cooperating to build the bitmap in parallel then a barrier might look more tempting, because then they'd all be waiting for each other to agree that they've all finished doing that and are ready to scan. When they're all just waiting for one guy to flip a single bit, then it's debatable whether a barrier is any simpler than a condition variable + a spinlock + a bit! -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: