Re: pg11.1: dsa_area could not attach to segment
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg11.1: dsa_area could not attach to segment |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEepm=2k=DXA56KEeRq05c2xSpdM5Kw4i-GG_MtzMXcnOkEnDA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg11.1: dsa_area could not attach to segment (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 4:27 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 4:01 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 08:43:14PM -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > > I have a suspicion that this doesn't happen if > > > parallel_leader_participation=off. > > > > I think this is tentatively confirmed..I ran 20 loops for over 90 minutes with > > no crash when parallel_leader_participation=off. > > > > On enabling parallel_leader_participation, crash within 10min. > > That's quite interesting. I wonder if it's something specific about > the leader's behaviour, or if it's just because it takes one more > process to hit the bad behaviour on your system. . o O ( is there some way that getting peppered with signals from the shm tuple queue machinery could break something here? ) -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: