Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEepm=2bXPDHwXXwFgSj6YV+wEFYd5W-a-53Grj1C55YxPx4xw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access
status of transaction 1
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2015-05-30 10:41:01 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote: >> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> >> Just saw what looks like a report of this issue on 9.2. >> >> >> >> https://github.com/wal-e/wal-e/issues/177 >> > >> > Urk. That looks awfully similar, but I don't think any of the code >> > that is affected here exists in 9.2, or that any of the fixes involved >> > were back-patched to 9.2. So that might be something else altogether. >> >> Not only that, the pg_multixact/members *directory* is reported >> missing, which is a different problem entirely. > > I don't read that from the log, what does make you think that that's the > case. Afaics it's "just" the 0146 member file that is missing? That's the error message, but then further down: "I have confirmed that directory "pg_multixact/members" does not existing in the restored data directory. I can see this directory and the file if i restore a few days old backup. I have used WAL-E backups a number of time from this server but this is the first time I am running into this issue." -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: