Re: ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING on pg_dump
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING on pg_dump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEepm=2A_aUfB4A7YvRFciaRHM4euu6or+OzDuEuuZ4mE7QVwg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING on pg_dump ("Ideriha, Takeshi" <ideriha.takeshi@jp.fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING on pg_dump
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 12:33 PM, Ideriha, Takeshi <ideriha.takeshi@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: >>+ Add ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING clause in the INSERT commands. >> >>I think this would be better as: Add <literal>ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING</literal> to >><command>INSERT</command> commands. > > Agreed. > >>+ printf(_(" --on-conflict-do-nothing dump data as INSERT >>commands with ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING \n")); >> >>That's slightly misleading... let's just use the same wording again, eg "add ON >>CONFLICT DO NOTHING to INSERT commands". > > Agreed. But you forgot fixing it at pg_dump.c. > So could you please fix this and commit it? Right, thanks. I noticed one more thing: pg_dumpall.c doesn't really need to prohibit --on-conflict-do-nothing without --insert. Its existing validation rejects illegal combinations of the settings that are *not* passed on to pg_dump. It seems OK to just pass those on and let pg_dump complain. For example, if you say "pg_dumpall --data-only --schema-only", it's pg_dump that complains, not pg_dumpall. I think we should do the same thing here. Pushed, with those changes. Thanks for the patch and the reviews! -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: