Re: dsa_allocate() faliure
От | Thomas Munro |
---|---|
Тема | Re: dsa_allocate() faliure |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAEepm=269dTFxHEapRhm8vf_GEkjSY_p2oU5Ngp48GZQKwyMnA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: dsa_allocate() faliure (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: dsa_allocate() faliure
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 10:33 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I observe from > > https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/utils/mmgr/freepage.c.gcov.html > > that the edge cases in this function aren't too well exercised by > our regression tests, meaning that the buildfarm might not prove > much either way about the correctness of this patch. That is one > factor pushing me to think we shouldn't risk it. But, taking a > longer view, is that something that's practical to improve? Yeah. This is a nice example of code that really deserves unit tests written in C. Could be good motivation to built the infrastructure I mentioned here: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAEepm%3D2heu%2B5zwB65jWap3XY-UP6PpJZiKLQRSV2UQH9BmVRXQ%40mail.gmail.com -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: